What is the difference between "creation science" and "intelligent design"?
Share
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
Creation science and intelligent design are both religious viewpoints that attempt to explain the origins of life and the universe. However, there are some key differences between the two.
**Creation science** is a literal interpretation of the biblical creation story, which states that God created the universe and all life on Earth in six days. Creation scientists believe that the Earth is only a few thousand years old, and that all of the evidence for evolution can be explained by natural processes, such as environmental changes or random mutations.
**Intelligent design** is a more recent concept that does not explicitly mention God. Intelligent design proponents believe that the complexity of life is too great to have arisen by chance, and that some kind of intelligent designer must have been involved. However, they do not specify who or what this designer might be.
Intelligent design is often criticized for being disguised creationism. This is because intelligent design proponents often use the same arguments as creationists, and they often have religious motivations for their beliefs. However, intelligent design proponents argue that their theory is not religious, and that it can be evaluated on its own scientific merits.
In 2005, the United States Supreme Court ruled that intelligent design could not be taught in public schools as an alternative to evolution. The Court ruled that intelligent design was not a scientific theory, but rather a religious viewpoint.
Despite the Court’s ruling, intelligent design remains a popular topic of discussion among creationists and other religious groups. Intelligent design proponents continue to argue that their theory is a legitimate scientific alternative to evolution.