Yes, there is a difference between what an Eastern philosopher perceives as materialistic compared with a Western philosopher.

In Western philosophy, materialism is the belief that the only things that exist are material objects. This means that everything else, such as thoughts, feelings, and ideas, are simply the result of the interaction of material objects.

In Eastern philosophy, materialism is often seen as a more limited view of reality. Eastern philosophers believe that there is more to reality than just material objects. They may believe in a spiritual realm, or they may believe that the material world is an illusion.

For example, in Buddhism, there is the concept of anatta, which means “no-self.” This concept teaches that there is no such thing as a permanent, unchanging self. Instead, the self is constantly changing, and it is made up of different parts, such as thoughts, feelings, and experiences.

This concept of anatta is in contrast to the Western idea of a self as a separate, individual entity. In Western philosophy, the self is often seen as the center of the universe, and it is responsible for its own actions.

The different views on materialism between Eastern and Western philosophy can lead to different ways of thinking about the world. For example, Eastern philosophers may be more likely to focus on the present moment, and they may be less concerned with material possessions. Western philosophers, on the other hand, may be more focused on the future, and they may be more likely to value material possessions.

Of course, there are many different schools of thought within both Eastern and Western philosophy, and not all philosophers within each tradition will agree on the nature of reality or the importance of materialism. However, the general trends outlined above do provide a helpful starting point for understanding the different ways in which materialism is viewed in these two broad traditions