The Buddhist philosophy of Anatta and the Advaita Vedanta philosophy of Brahman and Maya are both concerned with the nature of reality and the self. However, they have different views on these topics.

Anatta

In Buddhism, Anatta (Sanskrit: anātman) is the doctrine that there is no permanent, unchanging self. The self is instead seen as a collection of impermanent, ever-changing phenomena, such as thoughts, feelings, and sensations. This doctrine is central to Buddhist understanding of suffering and liberation.

Brahman and Maya

In Advaita Vedanta, Brahman is the ultimate reality, the ground of all being. Maya is the illusion of separateness from Brahman. According to this philosophy, the world we perceive is an illusion created by Maya. The goal of spiritual practice is to realize the truth of Brahman and to transcend Maya.

Similarities

Both Anatta and Brahman and Maya are concerned with the nature of reality and the self. Both philosophies reject the idea of a permanent, unchanging self. They also both see the world as being impermanent and illusory.

Differences

The main difference between Anatta and Brahman and Maya is their view of the relationship between the self and Brahman. In Buddhism, there is no self, while in Advaita Vedanta, the self is ultimately identical to Brahman.

Another difference between the two philosophies is their view of the goal of spiritual practice. In Buddhism, the goal is to achieve liberation from suffering, while in Advaita Vedanta, the goal is to realize one’s true identity as Brahman.

Conclusion

Anatta and Brahman and Maya are two different philosophies with different views on the nature of reality and the self. However, they both offer insights into the nature of suffering and the possibility of liberation.