Which movie did you like better, PS2 or Baahubali II?
Sign Up to our social questions and Answers Engine to ask questions, answer people’s questions, and connect with other people.
Login to our social questions & Answers Engine to ask questions answer people’s questions & connect with other people.
Lost your password? Please enter your email address. You will receive a link and will create a new password via email.
Please briefly explain why you feel this question should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this answer should be reported.
Please briefly explain why you feel this user should be reported.
It’s Class vs Mass
Both were entertaining for the price of their ticket
Baahubali II had a very simple and template storyline , very common in Indian cinema and global cinema
Son discovers he is special and avenges father
From Aboorva Sagodharargal to Lion King to Ajooba
Yet the BGM plus the Screenplay caught the interest of the audience and made it a blockbuster
PS2 has a far more complex story
It needed a master to make it into a movie
Mani Ratnam did the job wonderfully by simplifying the plot and condensing it and removing / changing a couple of actual parts of the story
Yet even this needed a very sauve audience to appreciate
I can bet that maybe 1 in 5 people who saw and liked Baahubali II would have liked PS2
It wasn’t because PS2 was bad
It was because PS2 was on a higher plane , story wise, screenplay wise, Historical angle wise
Audiences watch movies for fun and entertainment
They don’t like working their brains too much and cannot absorb a lot of different stuff
They like simple stuff with effects and bgm like Baahubali and Baahubali II
PS 2 is meant for a classier audience
Baahubali is a mass movie
Like Nayagan vs Baasha
Like Kuruthipunal vs Thuppaki